First Jack Dorsey, then everyone else

It isn't a mistake that right at the edge of the year wrapping up and someone decides to quit his “well paid” job in quotes. It’s obvious Jack’s move is backed by way more than the world can ever imagine… If we look a bit back at when Twitter began picking up traffic in a different way as a result of crypto enthusiasts, then again there came a buzz about “decentralization” which obviously wasn’t something well-fitting for a censored social network like Twitter, you’d realize that Jack hunger for a brand new network of freedom. This kinda makes us understand that the front guy isn’t ever the bad guy, the actual runner-ups for centralized networking as behind the scene authors, this is the effects of this financial system, but good a thing we are moving away from such financial times.

There's one thing we would most likely observe in coming times and that will be a drastic drop in the workforce. This is something worrisome to some extent, but It won't however be as that for a long period of time, the equation will eventually balance up as time passes. Jack’s resignation isn't one for no reason, this is one of those things that happens when a person figures he's been doing the wrong job, or perhaps they eventually learn to accept that they ain't happy with the nature of their job… If you look up Jack on Wikipedia, you'd figure he has had a couple of discomfort through his stay as chief executive officer at Twitter. A tweet he made after resigning gave the same message, and that's the fact founder-led companies come with great limitations. Eventually, people seek a job that gives them space to exist outside it at least, this is something not so served in the current world.

^{“There’s a lot of talk about the importance of a company being ‘founder-led.’ Ultimately, I believe that’s severely limiting and a single point of failure,” wrote Dorsey. “I’ve worked hard to ensure this company can break away from its founding and founders.Jack ”}

Working to get paid vs Working to create value

Working to get paid is just what has been running in this debt system, you figure that even before you make money, it is already taxed, this doesn't add value but it removes… How the hecks are developments ongoing but there's a constant increase in debt crises? Where is the money at? The value worked for, where have the efforts materialized? A lot of people may not get it, but the constant increase in cryptocurrency projects is a big long-term merit. Though people focus way too much on the competitions, forgetting that this is an open network where the larger the protocols span, the more range of curbing inflation it acquires. Where value is lost, there's the room given to a new head to manifest, this is how value keeps moving across chains until many are fed.

Jack had a couple of things he enjoyed outside working at Twitter and that was yoga and fashion design… Despite his wealth, it's funny to observe that he wasn't given the space to embrace his interest. There’s actually no freedom in a debt-strapped economy, the world keeps printing debt, requiring more labor, while crypto does the exact opposite. It’s about working via the heads of all committed, creating value from the unity built across networks, thereby sustaining on the labor thus far and that there is the enormous economy. Jack is moving away from a centralized network, and he’ll be seeking more humanly friendly alternatives, which I’m sure he already knows where.

Posted Using LeoFinance ^Beta