Posts

How Important Is Decentralization When It Comes To Investing In Blockchains?

avatar of @brennanhm
25
@brennanhm
·
0 views
·
2 min read

▶️ Watch on 3Speak


The key innovation behind crypto that makes this non-tangible asset valuable is the trust(lessness) factor. It allows us to do business peer-to-peer with another person, confident that our transactions won't be reversed or blocked by third-party. This is possible because each blockchain network is decentralized to some degree.

Some people argue that cryptocurrencies like Bitcoin and Ethereum are far more decentralized than blockchains such as EOS, Telos, and WAX. They argue that those chains should be avoided as they are less secure and more easily censored.

While it's true that Bitcoin and Ethereum have more nodes validating transactions, the majority of those nodes belong to mining pools. And just three or four of those mining pools control greater than 50% of the hash rate, meaning, in theory, they could collude to censor transactions on the network.

They do not, however, as they stand to lose more than benefit from this kind of tampering. For if they did, the attack would come to light quickly. Investors would quickly move their capital to more secure, decentralized chains, causing the value of the miner's Bitcoin and Ether to plummet.

Now we have blockchains like WAX and Telos, which have only 21 primary validators that produce blocks. They typically aren't anonymous like crypto miners, so we can be confident that these are in fact distinct organizations running the validators.

Over the last few years, both networks have grown and their respective WAX and TLOS tokens have accrued value. Neither the token holders nor the validators who are staking these tokens have an incentive to censor transactions, as it would cause the value of their tokens to drop substancially.

We have even more centralized chains coming out now, for example Ultra and Ronin, the Ethereum sidechain for Axie Infinity. These networks will have less than 10 validators, all appointed by the developers.

Although these chains are quite centralized, they are still transparent, and you can verify which account owns what, by using their public blockchain explorers. Again, these validators have no motivation to censor transactions, because they have substancial capital invested in the network, and need to keep their users for the chain to remain valuable.

It's possible that if these networks become successful enough, regulators could come down on them and attempt to shut them down or force the validators to implement some kind of KYC procedure. Of course, the token holders will be collaborating to ensure that this doesn't happen.

As always, remember to not put all your eggs in one blockchain, as it's not impossible that one of these blockchains could experience censorship in the future. Always maintain a diversified portfolio in case one chain experiences technical difficulties or some kind of attack.

Follow Me

HIVE -> @brennanhm Twitter -> @brennanhm Publish0x -> https://www.publish0x.com/@brennan Odysee -> https://odysee.com/@brennan:b

Sources

https://etherscan.io/stat/miner?range=7&blocktype=blocks


▶️ 3Speak