Posts

avatar of @dagger212
25
@dagger212
·
·
0 views
·
2 min read

I still think there's a middle ground here. The problem with these proposals is that there really needs to be a few days of discussion and THEN a vote. Let people voice their opinions and rationale BEFORE asking for a vote. That way you can make an informed decision by seeing all arguments rather than voting on your own drawn conclusions. I voted YES and I'm still leaning that way but I can certainly see extremely valid arguments for NO.

Here is why I'm still leaning YES. My LEO and everyone in before me (and after but before Cub) who sent in LEO provided LBI with the Cub they received. If I let the fund double in size, that doesn't double the Cub. It cuts my return on that Cub by 50%. I get that new holders will have to add more LEO than what the fund is "worth" per LEO so the dilution shouldn't really be felt. For example, if a 10% stake is worth $10,000 of a $100,000 total, then if someone comes in and doubles the fund to $200,000 then my now 5% stake of $200,000 will still be worth the same $10,000. But, like I said, where does that factor in the Cub I provided? Someone buying today gets the benefit of that Cub and lessens my benefit through dilution. At least that's what it seems like to me. Especially if Cub moons. They buy in today for 1.1 and in a month Cub goes to $30. My dividend is diluted where theirs is enhanced.

Anyway, like I said, if we had a discussion period and THEN a vote, we could talk about altering this proposal before voting on it.

I would like to see the number capped now at the "soft" number of 275,000. If people really want in, pay the market price. However, I would like to leave maybe as much as another 225,000 tokens left in reserve for future use cases. If we decided we wanted to open it up to new people, we could take a vote and do that. We could also decide to allow current users who want to increase their stake the ability to have first right of refusal on buying those new tokens.

If I have to vote on this current proposal, I will stick with my YES vote for the reasons mentioned above.

Posted Using LeoFinance Beta