“ Perhaps extra rewards for the top 5 posts or so? That could potentially mean that the same author wins multiple prizes, but it would also increase the overall chance for people to win something.”

I think increasing it to 5 posts that get rewarded is a great idea.

“ Not sure how this would actually work out in reality, but what about 100% upvotes with leo.voter”

I would love it if we could do this but the one issue with this is that the optimized content has likely already left the voting window. We could upvote one of their newer posts with 100% but I feel like that logistically defeats the purpose which is why I went with the liquid LEO rewards each week because then we don’t have to worry about voting windows.

“Which could mean that this will be on-going for a long, long time”

That is absolutely right. My goal would be to do this for the foreseeable future (perhaps in perpetuity, if it goes well).

Yes, I agree it could cause some authors to get thousands of LEO. Though that would mean that their content is pulling in massive traffic for the site which likely outweighs the actual LEO they’re receiving (in terms of LeoFinance gaining more value from that traffic than the 100 LEO each week is worth).

I wonder if we can create some sort of ranking variables? I.e. newer content that pulls in traffic is weighted more heavily than older content that pulls in the same amount of traffic?

Some sort of x * y variable on time vs. traffic per week.

Thoughts?

Posted Using LeoFinance ^Beta