Posts

Best And Worst Q4 2019: Mid Cap Blend ETFs And Mutual Funds by David Trainer

avatar of @leo.syndication
25
leo.syndication
@leo.syndication
·
0 views
·
4 min read

Summary

  • The Mid Cap Blend style ranks sixth in Q4'19.
  • Based on an aggregation of ratings of 21 ETFs and 381 mutual funds in the Mid Cap Blend style.
  • ONEV is our top-rated Mid Cap Blend ETF and CFSMX is our top-rated Mid Cap Blend mutual fund.
  • Looking for a helping hand in the market? Members of Value Investing 2.0 get exclusive ideas and guidance to navigate any climate. Get started today »

The Mid Cap Blend style ranks sixth out of the twelve fund styles as detailed in our Q4'19 Style Ratings for ETFs and Mutual Funds report. Last quarter, the Mid Cap Blend style ranked sixth as well. It gets our Neutral rating, which is based on an aggregation of ratings of 21 ETFs and 381 mutual funds in the Mid Cap Blend style. See a recap of our Q3'19 Style Ratings here.

Figures 1 and 2 show the five best and worst rated ETFs and mutual funds in the style. Not all Mid Cap Blend style ETFs and mutual funds are created the same. The number of holdings varies widely (from 19 to 2599). This variation creates drastically different investment implications and, therefore, ratings.

Investors seeking exposure to the Mid Cap Blend style should buy one of the Attractive-or-better rated ETFs or mutual funds from Figures 1 and 2.

Our Robo-Analyst technology[1] empowers our unique ETF and mutual fund rating methodology, which leverages our rigorous analysis of each fund’s holdings.[2] We think advisors and investors focused on prudent investment decisions should include analysis of fund holdings in their research process for ETFs and mutual funds.

  • Best ETFs exclude ETFs with TNAs less than $100 million for inadequate liquidity. Sources: New Constructs, LLC and company filings

Six ETFs (QVAL, XMHQ, MIDF, RVRS, FSMD, and TPLC) are excluded from Figure 1 because their total net assets are below $100 million and do not meet our liquidity minimums.

Figure 2: Mutual Funds with the Best & Worst Ratings – Top 5

  • Best mutual funds exclude funds with TNAs less than $100 million for inadequate liquidity. Sources: New Constructs, LLC and company filings

PNC Multi Factor All Cap Fund (PLEIX, PLECX) and Boston Trust Walden Mid Cap Fund (WAMFX) are excluded from Figure 2 because their total net assets (TNA) are below $100 million and do not meet our liquidity minimums.

State Street SPDR Russell 1000 Low Volatility Focus ETF (ONEV) is the top-rated Mid Cap Blend ETF and ALPS Series Clarkston Partners Fund (CFSMX) is the top-rated Mid Cap Blend mutual fund. Both earn a Very Attractive rating.

Invesco Raymond James SB-1 Equity ETF (RYJ) is the worst rated Mid Cap Blend ETF and Meridian Contrarian Fund (MFCAX) is the worst rated Mid Cap Blend mutual fund. RYJ earns an Unattractive rating and MFCAX earns a Very Unattractive rating.

The Danger Within Buying a fund without analyzing its holdings is like buying a stock without analyzing its business and finances. Put another way, research on fund holdings is necessary due diligence because a fund’s performance is only as good as its holdings’ performance. Don’t just take our word for it, see what Barron’s says on this matter.

PERFORMANCE OF HOLDINGs = PERFORMANCE OF FUND

Analyzing each holding within funds is no small task. Our Robo-Analyst technology enables us to perform this diligence with scale and provide the research needed to fulfill the fiduciary duty of care. More of the biggest names in the financial industry (see At BlackRock, Machines Are Rising Over Managers to Pick Stocks) are now embracing technology to leverage machines in the investment research process. Technology may be the only solution to the dual mandate for research: cut costs and fulfill the fiduciary duty of care. Investors, clients, advisors and analysts deserve the latest in technology to get the diligence required to make prudent investment decisions.

Figures 3 and 4 show the rating landscape of all Mid Cap Blend ETFs and mutual funds.

...Read the Full Post On Seeking Alpha

Author Bio:

Steem Account: @davidtrainer Twitter Account: NewConstructs

Steem Account Status: Unclaimed***

Are you David Trainer? If so, you have a Steem account that is unclaimed with pending cryptocurrency rewards sitting in it from your content. Your account was reserved by the Steemleo team and is receiving the rewards of all posts syndicated from your content on other sites.

If you want to claim this account and the rewards that it has been collecting, please contact the Steemleo team via twitter or discord to claim the account. You can also view the rewards currently sitting in the account by visiting the wallet page for this account.

What is Steemleo Content Syndication?

The Steemleo community is syndicating high-quality financial content from across the internet. We're also creating free Steem accounts for the authors of that content who have not yet discovered the Steem blockchain as a means to monetizing their content and we're listing those accounts as the 100% beneficiaries to all the rewards. If you want to learn more about Steemleo's content syndication strategy, click here.

Posted via Steemleo | A Decentralized Community for Investors