Bitcoin BARELY uses any energy, quit your FUDing.

Formalities aside, I'm sick and to my limits with how this uncreative, lazy, jerry-rigged excuse of a FUD manages to get so much tractions everytime Bitcoin is brought up. For every pump Bitcoin does, 10 headlines like this stick out of it like a tumor:

Which is really hilarious. How they managed to keep a straight face and a sturdy reputation, taking their readers for literal idiots believing this shit, after publishing this junk is mystifying. This is obviously a quick cash grab on the hype, and I remember at the time of the big rally environmentalists flaunted clout about how Bitcoin 'must be stopped!!!'

Makes you wonder whether they are true environmentalists, or just a bunch of buttcoiners huddled together.

This obviously fell flat to anyone who did any amount of digging behind these so-called 'Estimates' and 'Studies' (There were none credible), in addition to stark evidence like this:

You don't even need any of these to reach this conclusion, common sense, and a bit of general knowledge that deforestation, a direct injury to the environment itself, emit more than 12% of all greenhouse gases globally, is enough.

Brushing off those so-called 'environmentalists' as mere buttcoiners is easy, and almost always comes off as mocking and dismissive of those people and the points they bring up, which goes against my nature of trying to rationalize and understand where they come from their perspective. But the dogma of the situation is that there is no other interpretation of this puzzling behaviour in face of incontrovertible evidence. There is no lee way or wiggle room when it comes to concluding that they are but buttcoiners.

Posted Using LeoFinance ^Beta