Yea i can be in agreement with the government not wanting this type of prosperity for all it's citizens. How a company raises money and the investors and participants i don't feel should be under anything like Regulation D of the SEC.

Here's where my opinion now may differ from yours. If Ethereum was able to go out raise millions of dollars. Then become to some degree of the SEC's interpretation decentralized. Now Gensler i believe is fairly reexamining Ethereum and saying it was actually a security. i also disagree that the sec doesn't understand crypto. They may be trying to block citizens from using crypto. However they certainly understand it at it's most sophisticated level. I've studied Gary Gensler and he's very knowledgable.

Here's my problem. If the SEC goes after one project and declares it's a unregistered security. Then i feel it's only fair everybody's head is brought to the altar. This throwing darts on the wall of who we going to go after next isn't fair to other projects. Ethereum raised $18 million they are an unregistered security by any understanding of what an unregistered security is. They should be held accountable just like everyone else was.

As far as, citizens being able to have the economic prosperity and freedom of choice as to where they wish to put their money i support that. However part of the problem is the crypto space will still use the government to prosecute fraud cases in crypto and illegal activity. You can't be both a little bit pregnant and not pregnant. You operate free outside of government control or you don't. that's all i'm saying. crypto has to figure out what it wants to be.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zUkTi5OsXls

Posted Using LeoFinance ^Beta