Whereas, i do agree with the idea of focusing on keeping your current user base. This has urked me in that i feel like it's leaning towards limited growth. I think the proof of brain algo works so much into social media i just can't fathom the idea of limited to little growth. It just seems foreign to social media.

The other part is instability. There hasn't been a system like this that ever worked on large scale. So the data is inconclusive on how well it would perform. I think its also important to note with a smaller base of users on hive that some have been disgruntle. I've found several videos around youtube on disgruntle hive participants.

My concern in this is with an already small base restricting or limiting growth can seem counterproductive. I'm not saying hive restricts growth. However, i have had conversations with huge stakeholders in projects like these who had no aspirations for a huge network as they feared stability to their earnings and value.

The problem thus far is although they have achieved a great amount of success on hive they actually represent a very small part of the community. I fear their ideas about the platform aren't in its entirety healthy ones. So yes i agree keep the people you have but if thats the only people you have, as well, those people are portionally going out and in.. Then it kinda brings me back to my original thoughts of focusing on growth. Just a thought.

Posted Using LeoFinance ^Beta