I could somewhat understand all three different voting mechanisms that Vitalik explained in the post.
I think quadratic voting is very effective for projects to get DAO funds (DHF fund on HIVE).
1account 1vote is bullshit
100%
Vitalik says that DeGov solves two key problems
Funding public goods: how do projects that are valuable to a wide and unselective group of people in the community, but which often do not have a business model (eg. layer-1 and layer-2 protocol research, client development, documentation...), get funded?
Protocol maintenance and upgrades: how are upgrades to the protocol, and regular maintenance and adjustment operations on parts of the protocol that are not long-term stable (eg. lists of safe assets, price oracle sources, multi-party computation keyholders), agreed upon?
Like you said we have a system where you can easily buy your power. This in the long term is bad for Hive IMO, also it creates a situation of cementing power centers, and this is something we as a community tries to improve in the coming years and people like Vitalik can massively help Hive just giving the best approach to improve Hive.
Posted Using LeoFinance Beta
