Damn, you cover so many things I'll need to keep coming back to sort through each point for the next week or so.

I have to be honest, I'm extremely biased here, as some of the cliques I've been involved with here do not like @justineh, and that's putting it lightly. I don't know her and I've had no interaction with her.

I would say that is a lot of my clique. I've never been a fan of hers, don't follow or upvote her. Despite that, and at the risk of losing some of my larger supporters I posted earlier advocating for her proposal. I won't rehash my post here, but I do think there is great value to what she accomplished, enough to risk losing some of my major support by acknowledging and advocating.

I will need to think some on your idea to shift stake inflation to savings inflation. It's a hard swallow as the purpose of that inflation is to ensure the under the hood holdings (vests) don't erode due to the inflation. While it's true that voting is higher than that loss, I'm not certain we would see such a transfer into those savings account to see an adjustment upwards of significance in voting power. An interesting idea and will require more consideration on my part (not that any position I hold will change shit, lol).

As usual, I appreciate your take on things. Just not used to so much to digest at once, lol. Hope you enjoyed your day off.