Posts

#POB curation controversy _open debate

avatar of @racemlaadhar
25
@racemlaadhar
·
0 views
·
2 min read

good day all hivers, there was an open discussion evoked by @onealfa , in which he was clearly stating a curation concern that needs some attention and awareness.

the complain was like the following :

1% of my vote is yet about 0.83 Leo, or $0.50 USD. Why I should give out a 50 cent worth upvote on a shitty post, which still comply with the tribe's terms,

and now, it's reaching on to proofofbrain "as he clearly pointed our in this post

now for some of you it might look like a minor issue or it might be looked at as no issue at all. but, here's the thing it can't be regulations or imposing new rules to the communities but there has to be measures and a call to action on the matter. if left unresolved proofofbrain itself will be infected by these bees set loose without their QUEEN.

the problem solving

  • my own approach : let's face it guys, not everyone on hive has good writing skills or talented in some field of their interest but still make use for the token circulations and development of the blockchain, creating new blocks and so on...

so, without further ado, there is still sub communities that everyone can do right? just like, photography , vlogs, blogging about life, kitchen, food... and other stuff aboiut sharing something nice and fun to read and see.

for members who can do only that, with poor engagements also can be and must get upvoted as well, without making them seek other places for flowers to make their own honey.

right?
everyone deserves a vote but an upvote must be earned (as far as i understood from @onealfa )

But somebody must to tell these newbies - "you are not quite on the right path" Simple IGNORE or "skip over" is hardly a best solution here.

so here's my proper solution from my humble spot on POB ,
an portion of the upvotes must go to these individuals to contain their activity and not losing their contribution as extra army of bees in hive.

thank you.