Posts

Why I only give 100% upvotes to the same old people on Splintertalk, and it's NOT because I want to......

avatar of @revise.spt
25
@revise.spt
·
0 views
·
1 min read

I've qot a fairly large stake of SPT - 916 000 to be nearly preciese and I'm VERY HAPPY with the curation returns.....

The returns are NOT a problem, they are easily sufficient for me to spend some time reading and spread my vote out, which I'd quite like to do.

And I would quite enjoy reading some decent Splinterlands related content, there is some, but there is also a lot of shit.

I've got a number of reputable authors followed and in my feed, and upvoting them is easy but adding to it is difficult....

when I search for new content on 'recent' I FREQUENTLY click on something that looks interesting but in reality it's just a 100 word pretty-shit post which I'm not going to vote on.

That wouldn't be so bad if it didnt' then take a few seconds to get back to the created page, whirrrring, and that I'm jumped back up about 10 posts and I have to spend another few seconds while the feed whirrs through.

So it's tough for me to find new people to follow and curate because of this, so I end up ALWAYS giving 100% usually to the same old people just because it takes too long to do anything else.

If it worked smoothly I'd be more inclined to give 20 or more votes a day to a wider array of people of different vote weights.

The site needs better servers or something to make it more functional, IMO.