Taskmaster4450 wrote the post, silverstackeruk replying

In the scale of time, LBI at 5 months old is much further on the path than SPI was.

SPI was pretty much 100% HIVE POWER for its first year with off-platform investments representing 4,407 HIVE this time last year. SPI converted its STEEM to BTC/ETH & USDT but SPI was also holding 20k LEO that was only worth 1102 HIVE back then so growth for SPI has come from all angles. SPI was set up during the bear market and was very lucky the HIVE airdrop happened to be honest. It basically doubled the fund value overnight as 98% of the fund's assets were STEEM POWER.

As for LBI, it's 5 months old and already has a 5 figure wallet on CUB. It's still early days but I'd assume sooner are later we'll convert some stuff from CUB to other investments. LBI will do well from this bull year we are in but not as well as SPI due to the fact, SPI has been planning for this year for 2 years already. I think in market cycles and would expect LBI to see its massive growth period to come during the next bullrun in 4-5 years. The LBI tokens will of course continue to grow in LEO value but the dollar value might slip off during the next bear market as expected. When 2025 is here, LBI I hope will have had more time than SPI to prepare and I'd hope the epic raise will make SPI's 20x look small. 2025 is a long time off but 4 years ago doesn't seem that long ago either, right?

The plan for both SPI is the same. SPI is maybe a little more centralized than LBI is but the investment model is the same. There are lots of variables to consider for both, SPI would not be as valuable today if HIVE was never forked. The CUB airdrop for LBI was worth more in terms of dollars so has less impact but then Blank is coming soon and LBI still has to venture into new HIVE chain income streams to boast weekly earnings. Good question

Not sure if I answered your question.

Posted Using LeoFinance ^Beta