...'your curation APR is relative to your voting habits. This unnamed person is not using his voting correctly and gains a crap return. It's your choice to get your rewards or not'...

I have no idea what to think of it. I have read a lot here, especially the last weeks, and commented a lot. The articles I voted for were all very good. But are there also many small authors who don't get such big rewards?

Am I doing something wrong because of that? I think not. I'm not here to chase money, mourn or anything like that. I'm looking for interesting content and interaction with people who share the same interests. If I were to follow this curation logic, would I still move separately? I simply vote for those I know are regularly voted for. Thanks to Blockchain, it's easy to find out. But what is the effect?

In this sense, I'll probably stay on track with 4% APR.

Posted Using LeoFinance ^Beta