RE: SPinvests weekly earnings and holdings reports #45
2 yr
0 Min Read
46 words
Slow and steady wins the race.
SPInvest not going slow...we move at rapid fire pace.
I agree about gaming, not a good investment. A nice return if playing for enjoyment but 10% in a year is not a great allocation of resources.
Posted Using LeoFinance Beta
I'm not so sure games are a bad investment. Is this accounting for the value of NFTs gained by the account through play? Also, it feels like all of these games are in their like, pre-Farmville stage. There's still a lot of room to grow, and as it grows, the artificial scarcity of the game systems is going to shine through.
We arent playing. SPI invests in games to try and get a return. That is what this is about.
As I said, if playing, it might be a good deal since the interest would be coupled with the rewards.
And with NFTs, they might be hot right now, but will that continue. For some sure. But I am not sure SPI is looking at sifting through things to that degree to make an investment decision. A lot of other opportunities that it could simply add to its existing investment.
Posted Using LeoFinance Beta
Not so into NFT's for gaming are art, I dont understand it. Give me an NFT that owns a percentage of a house that is generating monthly rental and you talking my language.
as the gaming, were not playing so i guess we are doing it wrong. Not that much invested anyways, nothing ventured, nothing gained.
Posted Using LeoFinance Beta
I don't mean "play" in the sense of "play for entertainment," but in the sense of "engage with the game's mechanics," which, looking at spi-steemcity's dCity, looks like it happens. I'm wondering if the value of things like workers in that game are accounted for, is all.