After reading yesterday about the creation of another service which in my opinion is not providing any added value but only the same old story of how to get rewarded without deserving to, AKA "reward.app", I have recovered my positive hopes regarding this/our blockchain while discovering that major curation initiatives as @curangel are not going to support any post which uses this kind of new bid-bots generation.

You can read here what "reward.app" is about and also here .

Judge by yourself, but I think there are many ways to fix the current problems, some of them already tested in the past and easy to solve.

For instance:

- Remove the stupid 5' voting-window penalty and let the people upvote without cuts at any time. - Come back to the LINEAR REWARDING CURVE. The current one which benefits to big accounts which writes everything but good posts, usually. - Why not implementing an extra prize for discovering good content of newcomers instead?

The two first are VERY EASY to solve, just changing known parameters in the blockchain.

The third, I agree, it will cost more and it has to be better defined, but I mean, we have to improve for sure the USER RETENTION which is scarce because the lack of support for newcomers is very little among other reasons...

I know that HIVE is a game on which getting the most is a must but if we keep doing the same we have done till now but in a different manner, we know what will happen in the long run.

Again, I would like to thank @curangel for not supporting these kind of "new original ideas" . Hope others would follow your steps.

@toofasteddie

Posted Using LeoFinance