Even though a WLEO-ETH.RUNE would be a nice addition, I think it would be much better to keep focusing on the ETH-WLEO side first rather than spread (and partially dilute) our 'liquidity power'.

I think that currently Leofinance has a lot of things in the pipeline and with our current situation in Uniswap we have the 'liquidity problem' more than solved in the short term (we don't have a lot of volume anyway).

I would like to see a 'faster' launch + optimization of the new ____ project + all the token/miners airdrops rather than diluting dev work into 'more liquidity pools'.

Even more, I would say that I would prefer to create a WLEO version in Binance chain and then try to get us listed on BepSwap rather than try to link us with $RUNE in the eth side (only because we already have one). Did you think about that possibility? (honestly I don't even know if it's even possible, just a quick idea that crossed my mind).

5. In short, are you in?

'Not now, maybe in a few months'

If there's not a better use-case for devs time then yes, if this would delay the other developments then no.

Hope you understand my point, have a good Friday :)

Posted Using LeoFinance ^Beta