i think they have a point. If i'm in my environment around my lake and all this crypto mining going on i understand enough to know its not good for the lake and the wildlife in the lake and why should i care further than that when i'm not the beneficiary of cryptocurrency. See alot of people out there in the mainstream they not benefiting from crypto with distribution rates as horrible as we have why should they be.

The algos on the horizon really don't need all these mining facilities anyway. Bitcoin does but then bitcoin 87% of the network is owned by 1%.. Why should i care about that. If i'm going to care about a cryptocurrency i'd just pick the ones that don't need as many mining facilities i'd look for a different algo. So i think they have a valid point. I can see why people invested in bitcoin would be upset but thats their problem. Whoever decided bitcoin shouldn't evolve maybe they lack the foresight to see what the future looks like. So if its another way no i'm not going to champion bitcoin on theories of it may or may not destroy the environment i don't have to take the chance and they don't either.

Posted Using LeoFinance ^Beta