Yes grassroots and well spread out funding is always more desirable. One of the biggest issues with crypto has still been it follows a pattern like our standard economy. Where the most wealthy and powerful still have a level of control and power comparable to what they have in the standard economy in crypto. I think we can clearly see how that defeats the purpose of what crypto is trying to accomplish.

Centralization of wealth and or power and control is not decentralization by sense of the idea. So community democratic funding mechanisms.. .i'd even go as far as limiting or atleast trying to limit through governance big wallets from funding projects.. almost like how they have limited campaign contributions in politics because again once you all go down that avenue of 40% whale control over the network like hive has. Then it's not much different than how venture capitalist work now.

Posted Using LeoFinance ^Beta