Shockingly, I'm going to say that they need to fix the in game economy so that the people who own and sell/rent the picks and shovels need to be able to make a living.

I know where you stand on this and agree that the economy needs tweaking slightly to help the lower levels but the numbers that we saw for a few months were not realistic.

Nothing should be earning 120% APR and stay sustainable. I think that the players should be able to earn a living with the owners able to earn 20 - 25% passively a good balance.

How you strike that balance is another question but i would be happy renting out assets at those returns.

We are seeing the downturn from nuking the bots, cancelling the lower earnings, new cards entering the market and the crypto market in general. The same way as we saw the surge from a combination of factors but overall splinterlands hasn't dipped too badly considering. This is the rebalancing phase of the game where assets will get bought up over time and new players are still coming in.

I think it's a healthy thing to happen and they are trying to get that balance right all of the time. We saw a lot of growth in a short space of time and this pullback gives the team a breather to see what wasn't working and go again stronger with the next phase. They did hurt themselves with the changes but i think that it is only short term and as the number one game out there have a lot of eyes watching for the next move. It wouldn't take much interest to start the charge all over again.

Splinterlands is flawed but still my best prospect for fame and fortune.

Posted Using LeoFinance ^Beta