You've done what we all should do when providing liquidity... in my case I didn't provide liquidity yet, but playing with the idea. I have a question: in scenario 1 you state (under the conditions set out by you), the percentage is yearly return only depends on the pool size. But what about the amount of transactions. Each transaction give the pool 0,3% as swap fee which is (partially) distributed to the liquidity providers. When many trades are executed in a day, this gives more fee income as opposed to just a few trades a day. Therefore I would think this is another variable that can't taken out of the equation. Or am I missing or miss interpreting something?

Posted Using LeoFinance ^Beta